vision2020
RE: Our kickin' sitchyashun
- To: <lucyzoe@moscow.com>, <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: RE: Our kickin' sitchyashun
- From: thansen@moscow.com
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:11:20 GMT
- Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <JYM9bD.A.3VP.6-5k9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Greetings Visionaires -
Judging by the previous postings (and application of the Idaho Statute), would
I be correct in assuming that proper behavior would have been for the
proprietor to warn (or ultimately evict) those customers that were "heckling"
Bertolini?
Don't get me wrong. I (in no way) applaud Bertolini or any other member of the
Aryan Nations.
As much as I hate Bertolini and all that he stands for, he has the same rights
as all of us.
Tom Hansen
Moscow
> Ron wrote:
> As I understand it, the proprietor didn't evict him-- the other diners
> just
> gave him a hard time verbally until he left (exercised their free
> speech?).
>
> Lucy says:
> You'll notice Ron, that the ACT doesn't say For a *proprietor,*
> it says For a *person.* Therefore, it doesn't really make a difference
> *who* denies another individual according to the Act.
>
>
>
> Here's what the Idaho Statute says:
> TITLE 67
> STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS
> CHAPTER 59
> COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
> 67-5909. ACTS PROHIBITED. It shall be a prohibited act to discriminate
> against a person because of, or on a basis of, race, color, religion,
> sex
> or national origin, in any of the following...
>
> 5) For a person;
> (a) to deny an individual the full and equal enjoyment of the
> goods,
> services, facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations of a
> place of public accommodation, or
> (b) to print, circulate, post, or mail or otherwise cause to be
> published a statement, advertisement or sign which indicates that
> the
> full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities,
> privileges, advantages of a place of public accommodation will be
> refused, withheld from, or denied an individual or that an
> individual's
> patronage of or presence at a place of public accommodation is
> objectionable, unwelcome, unacceptable, or undesirable.
>
>
>
>
> I've been to bars like that...
> ********************************************
> Ron Force rforce@moscow.com
> Moscow Idaho USA
> ********************************************
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Douglas [mailto:dougwils@moscow.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:47 PM
> > To: Vision2020@moscow.com
> > Subject: Our kickin' sitchyashun
> >
> >
> > Dear visionaries,
> >
> > Yahoo! Melynda came up with someone I could (and would) kick out of my
> > restaurant!
> >
> > But I am confused about the change of topic. Weren't we in the middle
> of
> > folks explaining to me why I had to sell whatever social goods I had
> for
> > sale to whoever wanted them?
> >
> > I am hopelessly confused and have lost my place. Do I get to kick
> people
> > out of my restaurant? Or do I have to live in Sandpoint?
> >
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> >
> > Douglas Wilson
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.net/
Back to TOC