vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

RE: Our kickin' sitchyashun



Ron wrote:
As I understand it, the proprietor didn't evict him-- the other diners
just
gave him a hard time verbally until he left (exercised their free
speech?).

Lucy says:
You'll notice Ron, that the ACT doesn't say For a *proprietor,*
it says For a *person.*  Therefore, it doesn't really make a difference
*who* denies another individual according to the Act.



Here's what the Idaho Statute says:
                                 TITLE  67
                    STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS
                                CHAPTER 59
                        COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
 67-5909.  ACTS PROHIBITED. It shall be a prohibited act to discriminate
against a person because of, or on a basis of, race, color, religion,
sex
or national origin, in any of the following...

5)  For a person;
    (a)  to deny an individual the full and equal enjoyment of the
goods,
    services, facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations of a
    place of public accommodation, or
    (b)  to print, circulate, post, or mail or otherwise cause to be
    published a statement, advertisement or sign which indicates that
the
    full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities,
    privileges, advantages of a place of public accommodation will be
    refused, withheld from, or denied an individual or that an
individual's
    patronage of or presence at a place of public accommodation is
    objectionable, unwelcome, unacceptable, or undesirable.




I've been to bars like that...
********************************************
Ron Force	      	  rforce@moscow.com
Moscow Idaho USA
********************************************


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas [mailto:dougwils@moscow.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:47 PM
> To: Vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject: Our kickin' sitchyashun
>
>
> Dear visionaries,
>
> Yahoo! Melynda came up with someone I could (and would) kick out of my
> restaurant!
>
> But I am confused about the change of topic. Weren't we in the middle
of
> folks explaining to me why I had to sell whatever social goods I had
for
> sale to whoever wanted them?
>
> I am hopelessly confused and have lost my place. Do I get to kick
people
> out of my restaurant? Or do I have to live in Sandpoint?
>
>
> Cordially,
>
>
> Douglas Wilson
>
>




Back to TOC