vision2020

[Date Prev]	[Date Next]	[Thread Prev]	[Thread Next]
[Date Index]	[Thread Index]	[Author Index]	[Subject Index]

Re: Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette

To: "'Vision 20/20'" <vision2020@moscow.com>
Subject: Re: Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette
From: Bob Hoffmann <escape@alt-escape.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:23:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <003c01c21ba3$a39ba160$880aa8c0@credenda.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
Resent-Message-ID: <BDPp3B.A.XFO.CG-F9@whale2.fsr.net>
Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com

At 01:21 PM 6/24/2002 -0400, Doug Jones wrote:
>Why not just assume that each person is sincere but is talking from a 
>different paradigm?

I believe this is true, Doug.  It's just that, as someone pointed out, "my 
rights end when they interfere with your rights," but there seems to be 
some irreconcilable overlap in what everybody considers to be inalienable 
rights.  I see this as the matter under discussion.

Bob Hoffmann
846 Mabelle St.
Moscow, ID  83843

Tel: 208 883-0642

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette
  - From: Daniel Kronemann <kron4155@uidaho.edu>

References:
- Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette
  - From: "Doug Jones" <credenda@moscow.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Reply to Bill Strand's Concern
Next by Date: re: other voices, was etiquette
Prev by thread: RE: Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette
Next by thread: Re: Checkers-Backgammon Etiquette
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to TOC