Re: chambervcommissioners?

[WMSteed@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/11/01 1:05:56 PM, RingoShirl@aol.com writes:

<< The concern should be for the system.  Is it 
desirable, in general, to have one individual serve in both positions? >>

<<whether we want to open the door to this possibility in the future>>

Is the non-personal concern that the person in this situation may do 
something for the City to the detriment of the county or visa versa?  Isn't 
the City in the County and the County in the City?  No possibility both the 
City and County (all citizens) could benefit in this situation?


Walter Steed