Re: Erotic retardation saga

[ltrwritr@moscow.com (Mark Rounds)]

I think what is happening is that you are hitting the Reply button to
respond to these posts.  Of the post is off the 2020 list you are fine, if,
on the other hand, the post comes from someone with a CC field to thr 2020
list, they only will get the post.  You might get a response because the
post went to an individual.  If you just double check your To: block when
you hit reply, you should get around this one.

On your other post, I am all in favor on a more mannerly society.  However
legislating good manners is a fruitless task.  Encouraging them works far
better.  That is done by living an example that the people around you wish
to emulate.  This is much slower than legislating, but it is the one that
sticks.

Mark Rounds

At 03:41 PM 7/17/02 -0700, Douglas wrote:
>
>Dear visionaries,
>
>Does anyone know why some of my posts come back and show up on computer, 
>while others appear to be going to all the others (judging from the fact 
>that they respond to them) but I don't see them? Does this happen to anyone 
>else?
>
>Debi Robinson-Smith writes:
>So, again Mr. Wilson is placing the responsibility for men's behavior on 
>women? Sorry, that dog won't hunt...This is antiquated thinking (she wrote 
>at the risk of yet again being called a "modernist").
>	
>	Actually, the antiquated concept I had in mind was not that women are 
>responsible for men's behavior. I was calling for mutual courtesy and 
>cooperation between the sexes. Manners. That kind of thing. From both 
>sexes. And I will lay off the modernist charge for a while, but I do wish 
>that common courtesy was more common in these, um, non-antiquated days.
>
>