vision2020
Highway Values--was US95 South
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Highway Values--was US95 South
- From: Greg Brown <gregb@alaskapacific.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:52:31 -0800
- References: <036901c21d53$6fdada60$b571e4ce@oemcomputer>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 01:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <Ztx25.A.YnL.AKtG9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
Visionaries:
I recently completed a manuscript on the
multiple values of highways and how people
perceive highways and landscapes. I believe
the current debate over US 95 reinforces
my conclusions.
If you are interested in reading about
an alternative view of highways, I've
attached my Discussion section from
the manuscript.
Using my model of a highway experience
opportunity spectrum, where would
you place the current US 95? How
about after widening to 4 lanes?
--
Greg Brown (gregb@alaskapacific.edu)
Associate Professor and Chair
Environmental Science Department
Alaska Pacific University
(907) 564-8267
http://polar.alaskapacific.edu/gregb
discussion.pdf
- References:
- US95 South
- From: "Dan Carscallen" <predator75@moscow.com>
Back to TOC