vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: A Well Regulated militia



I consider forwarding messages sent to an individual on to a list to be
well beyond the pale of netequette.  I am highly dissapointed.

R

At 10:14 AM 9/21/99 -0700, sec@moscow.com wrote:
>Date sent:      	Tue, 21 Sep 1999 09:28:43 -0700
>To:             	sec@moscow.com
>From:           	"Robert C. Tindall" <rtindall@fsr.com>
>Subject:        	Re: A Well Regulated militia
>
>> At 09:17 AM 9/21/99 -0700, sec@moscow.com wrote:
>> 
>> <SNIP>
>> 
>> >Citizen: Goes into County Sherrifs office, pays fees applys for 
>> >CCW, is granted (or refused, Washington isin't a "right to carry 
>> >state" that I know of), unless applicant has criminal record, no 
>> >further action is taken against him.
>> 
>> I got a carry permit in Washington.  When I picked it up the chief of
>> police said that Washington had to give migrant workers permits unless
>> they could prove some form of criminal activity.  Basically if you are a
>> citizen/resident you have to shoot the authorizing agent in the presence
>> of witnesses to be denied, and if you're an illegal alien you only have to
>> shoot in the general direction of the authorizing agent for denial.
>> 
>> Now I'm in Mocba, though, and I suspect my Washington license is no longer
>> valid (kinda like my EMT license, I suspect).
>> 
>> R
>
>ok, does sound like right to carry, Migrant workers? not if there 
>aliens, (then again,  length of residency might count) then again, 
>this may be one of those laws that the cops don't know about untill 
>they need to bust you (Like that East Indian Student a year or 2 
>ago in Pullman, this is what they busted him on before he hung 
>himself in his cell)
>
>Stan
> 




Back to TOC