vision2020
Re: Recycling
- To: "Relene Johnson" <relene@turbonet.com>, <Vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: Recycling
- From: "John and Laurie Danahy" <JDANAHY@turbonet.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:11:44 -0800
- Reply-To: "John and Laurie Danahy" <JDANAHY@turbonet.com>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:10:22 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"6np9d.A.fxE.ee_-2"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Thank you for posting the information regarding
curbside recycling in Moscow. I have been supportive of recycling in the
past and will continue to be supportive in the future. I recognize
recycling as a very necessary function of the city and it's
citizens.
A few questions regarding the curbside
program.
What kind of survey was done to see what level
of participation would occur before the program was put in place? Ws the
survey of a few households or city wide?
IS the $2.11 the city is paying per household
paid per year? Month? week? Does this $2.11 represent an increase in the
amount the city pays over what it was paying before curbside recycling? If
so, where is the city getting the funds? Is some other project not being funded
so we can have curbside recycling? How will the city know the number of
households participating or is the fee paid based on the total number of
households in Moscow? Does households include apartment complexes and if
so how do such residents participate in curbside recycling?
Curbside recycling is sure to be convenient for
some residents, but not everyone. It may result in more recycling being
done, but I doubt the increase will be in any way significant. People who
will recycle using curbside service already recycle. People who do not
recycle will not start, unless there is some substantial economic reason to do
so.
I do not mind subsidizing recycling, it is
probably needed in order to provide the service. But I do not see a reason
to subsidize waste collection of those who do not recycle, and I fear that the
$2.11 fee is, in fact, indirectly subsidizing those residents who do not
recycle.
John
Back to TOC