Re: US Constitution and Mutating Ethics

[thansen@moscow.com]

Mr. Harrell -

It was you that brought up conceivable changes that could occur with the 
Constitution and the Amendment process (which I am very familiar with).

My initial (and current) discussion did/does not concern changes, only 
interpretation of the Constitution.  You claim that the Constitution is 
extremely specific and has no "room" for interpretation.  I claim that you are 
wrong and that interpretation is the responsibility of our Congress and the 
Supreme Court.  Thusly, responsibility for interpretation belongs to "the 
people".

Sometimes an amendment to the Constitution is not necessary, merely an 
interpretation and how that interpretation is applied.

Mangle away,

Tom Hansen
Moscow

---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.net/