RE: Unalienable Rights...

[thansen@moscow.com]

I rather enjoy heated discussions.  Granted, at times these discussions may
get a bit ignorant (and I will admit partial blame).  But, where would this
world be without critics?  It is always the critic that keeps things in
"check".  People may hate/dislike/despise the expressed opinions of the
critic, but God bless them.  It is a better world considering the
alternative.

Take care,

Tom Hansen
Moscow

> It seems the debate is at cross-purposes, once again. In my understanding,
> Tom and Don, etc.  are positing that you can support the military
> _personnel_ w/out necessarily supporting the actions of the
> government/military. Melynda, etc., are positing that we have the right,
> and it must be supported, to voice our opposition to the actions of the
> military. However, this is all getting wrapped up into a generic,
> emotionalized 'PEACENIK' vs. 'MILITANT' debate which will continue ad
> nauseum until another hot topic comes along for people to debate at
> cross-purposes.
> 
> So, do you all agree that we should support the individual person (under
> the uniform) in the military, while we can certainly question, debate and
> oppose the orders they follow?
> 
> Debbie Gray
> 
> %^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%
>   Debbie Gray      dgray@uidaho.edu      http://www.uidaho.edu/~dgray/
>   We must be willing to get rid of the life we've planned, so as to
>   have the life that is waiting for us." --Joseph Campbell
> %^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%^%
> 


---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.net/