Re: Our kickin' sitchyashun

[Ed <eevans@moscow.com>]

I don't know about that.. What if a bunch of Aryans heckled a Jewish guy out 
of a diner? Legal? Maybe so.

Cheers,
-Ed Evans

On Thursday 26 September 2002 17:27, Sunil Ramalingam wrote:
> Lucy,
> If you look to Idaho Code 67-5902(5) for the definition of person, it reads
> "Person" includes an individual, association, corporation, joint
> apprenticeship committee, joint-stock company, labor union, legal
> representative, mutual company, partnership, any other legal or commercial
> entity, the state, or any governmental entity or agency;
>
> I believe the Act applies to employers and proprietors, not individuals
> such as the diners in a restaurant.  While in the Bertollini example the
> diners were rude, I doubt they are liable under the Act.
>
> However, I urge you not to take my word for this, and should you choose to
> heckle a fellow diner, do not claim that I said it would be okay.  This is
> just an estimate, and your results may vary.
>
> Sunil Ramalingam
>
> From: "Lucy Zoe" <lucyzoe@moscow.com>
>
> >Reply-To: <lucyzoe@moscow.com>
> >To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
> >Subject: RE: Our kickin' sitchyashun
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:28:13 -0700
> >
> >Ron wrote:
> >As I understand it, the proprietor didn't evict him-- the other diners
> >just
> >gave him a hard time verbally until he left (exercised their free
> >speech?).
> >
> >Lucy says:
> >You'll notice Ron, that the ACT doesn't say For a *proprietor,*
> >it says For a *person.*  Therefore, it doesn't really make a difference
> >*who* denies another individual according to the Act.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx