vision2020
RE: Compassion
- To: ddouglas@pacsim.com
- Subject: RE: Compassion
- From: "Ted Moffett" <ted_moffett@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 04:02:21 +0000
- Cc: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <EVmHlB.A.4II.YYTk9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
David:
If you want to elevate John Harrell's juvenile insulting outburst where he
labels women who might choose to show their breasts in public "sluts" to the
status of an expression of a "cultural and religious tradition," then I
suggest you might also need to recover from the warped psychology that can
justify making such a degrading comment about women while linking this
defense to a certain "religious tradition." You do a disservice to your
ideology and/or theology by coming to the defense of misogynist mud
slinging.
I also sincerely wish you a full recovery. Now, you're not going to ask
what from, I hope?
Yours in worship of the divine female in us all,
Ted
>From: "David Douglas" <ddouglas@pacsim.com>
>To: "'Ted Moffett'" <ted_moffett@hotmail.com>
>CC: <vision2020@moscow.com>
>Subject: RE: Compassion
>Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:32:36 -0700
>
>Mr. Moffett:
>
>Your post seems to omit some information:
>
>snip> ....mindset, that accepts the validity of and sacredness of the many
>valuable cultural and religious traditions of the human race. <snip
>
>Well, Mr. Harrell appears to have a cultural and religious tradition. And
>yet you further write:
>
>snip> "You have my deepest sympathy, Mr. Harrell, and my sincere hopes for
>a
>full recovery!" <snip
>
>What exactly is Mr. Harrell supposed to recover from, and why does he merit
>your deepest sympathy? Is his religious tradition not valid? By what
>standard do you judge its validity, and what qualifies you to subordinate
>his viewpoint to another (yours).
>
>How can even most traditions be valid? Some say there is no God, others
>say
>God is everything. If everyone can be correct, why not Mr. Harrell?
>
>It seems that the "validity of ... the many ....traditions of the human
>race"--is not without stipulations. What are they? And what,
>specifically,
>does one believe that is consistent with and accepts as valid all (or
>nearly
>all) religious traditions?
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>David Douglas
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Back to TOC