vision2020
Re: Argonaut editorial
I've given my opinion regarding this issue, and I still don't understand why
you feel this ordinance is neccesary. You keep attacking my stance without
giving me yours. Please answer my question so I have an understanding. I
don't want to assume I know, but I will put pieces together based on my
current understanding. If you think that is illogical and extreme, that is
your right, but it lessons not my interpretation. I'm tired of quibling
over this without knowing your side, so please, humor me and explain YOUR
side. Your "anticipation" that next comes the fall of western civilization
is no less extreme than my interpretation, in my opinion.
Garrett Clevenger
>From: WMSteed@aol.com
>To: idahomer@hotmail.com, WMSteed@aol.com, thansen@moscow.com,
>dougwils@moscow.com, vision2020@moscow.com
>Subject: Re: Argonaut editorial
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:59:49 EDT
>
>
>In a message dated 9/17/02 5:20:04 PM, idahomer@hotmail.com writes:
>
><< Why are breasts your concern, and not other parts of a women's body that
>may
>cause the same reaction you are concerned about? This is a concern because
>of regimes such as the Talban that appears to have
>taken your logic about the breasts and placed it upon the whole women. >>
>
>You haven't heard any of "my logic about the breasts," only my interest in
>attempting to understand yours. Unfortunately, you continue to use, what I
>consider to be, extremes and illogic in your opposition to the ordinance,
>with talk about the Talban, keeping women's skin covered, restricting women
>from showing their curves, lips and hair, her laughter and prevention of
>women from dancing. I anticipate next it will be the "fall of western
civilization" if this local topless ordinance is not repealed.
>Walter Steed
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Back to TOC