vision2020
Re: opt out? An apology
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: opt out? An apology
- From: Kelley Racicot <kelley@racicot.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:11:09 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <F200w2POMDxtm17vqUh00021c32@hotmail.com>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <S0Q0xB.A.rFB.ERDc9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.3
HI Sunil,
As conventional weapons grow in power, the line blurs. Fuel-air explosives
and other 'area' weapons might likely be called weapons of mass destruction.
Same with cluster bombs. The Daisy-cutters used in Afghanistan hazed the
issue a bit more.
Chuck
> From: "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam@hotmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:28:52 -0700
> To: sunilramalingam@hotmail.com, credenda@moscow.com, vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject: RE: opt out? An apology
> Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
> Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Sunil
>
> PS Does napalm count? Would that get me off the hook?
Back to TOC