vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

opt out?



Dear visionaries,

The issue is not whether we should have to pay for asphalt that covers streets we never drive on. Collective societal action cannot be one vast time-share arrangement.

The question is actually what criteria should we use to determine what sorts of activities can be applied to all of us in this way. We all agree on the street lights. Would we all agree if the government (local, state, or federal) started publishing a newspaper? If they published a newspaper that contained (surprise!) daily editorials praising the wisdom and insight of the current administration, would it be unreasonable to ask to opt out of that?

I once asked Bill Hall why he supported government control of education and opposed government control of newspapers. He said that he did so because education was so important. But does this mean that the government should only be prohibited from controlling the flow of unimportant information?

I am willing for the government to control the flow of water, broken pumps or not. I am willing for them to control the flow of traffic. I am not willing for them to control the flow of information. But if you differ with this, and think that they should be allowed to control the flow of information, then why not a public newspaper? And would I be allowed to opt out?



Back to TOC