vision2020
Re: Gay California teachers 'come out' in classroom
OK.
Question 1) What would your opinion be of an individual greater than 18
years old who is having ongoing sexual relations with a pre-pubescent child
(generally less than age 13) if 302.2 were removed form the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders?
Question 2) What would your opinion have been of a person who professed to
be a homosexual before the removal of homosexuality as a disorder from the
DSM?
Question 3) What is your opinion of the same professed homosexual now since
the removal of homosexuality as a disorder?
MR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard & Amy Newsome" <amyrichard.newsome@verizon.net>
To: "Mike Rush" <mike.rush@cableaz.com>; "Archie" <archie@moscow.com>;
<vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Gay California teachers 'come out' in classroom
> I said "consenting individuals" not "consenting adults". Since I am sure
we
> are all aware, like it or not, that some indidividuals under 18 are
sexually
> active. What would I say about pedophilia if age of consent is changed
to
> 12? My view would not change, to be diagnosed (a DSM diagnosis) as a
> pedophile sexual attraction/acts must be directed toward a child who has
not
> reached puberty, generally age 13 or younger. The diagnosis is not made
if
> the individual is age 16 or younger or is less than five years older than
> the child involved.
> Amy Newsome
>
>
> > Groups like NAMBLA are trying to lower the age of consent to 12 or
below.
> > Are those at 12 'consenting adults' also? If it were lowered to 12,
what
> > would you then say about pedophilia.
> >
> > MR
> >
> > > > The purpose of the homosexual agenda is an attempt to normalize an
> > > abnormal
> > > > sexual preference. What's next, normalizing an abnormal sexual
> > preference
> > > > such as pedophilia? How about bestiality? Where does the societal
> line
> > > get
> > > > drawn?
> > > >
> > > > Mike Rush
> > > >
> > >
> > > Homosexuality is between consenting individuals, pedophilia and
> bestiality
> > > are not. There's your line.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Back to TOC