Re: Freedom (was ACLU spam)

["Mike Rush" <mike.rush@cableaz.com>]

Its not an issue of thinking.  It is an issue of advocacy, and aiding and
abetting.

MR

Question...  Can you be convicted of aiding and abetting a crime if you just
talk about the crime or explaining how to accomplish it or not talking about
the crime if you know it has occurred?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ry Jones" <rjones@airgap.net>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Freedom (was ACLU spam)


> > From: Scott Dredge [mailto:sdredge@yahoo.com]
> > I would expect that your "what
> > would you do" scenario would be played out much in
> > the same way that people are reacting to priests
> > molesting children.
>
> They committed a crime, raping kids. They should go to jail. Is it so hard
> to understand that?
>
> > --- Mike Rush <mike.rush@cableaz.com> wrote:
> > These people are going adter 12 year olds to have sex.
>
> And as soon as they do, they commit a crime and get a trip to jail.
>
> > > WHat will you do if they
> > > come after your 12 year old (assuming you have one)?
>
> Shoot "them".
>
> Amazing that neither of you can see the difference between talking about
> something and doing it.
>
> Child rapers will always be with us. As soon as they act on the desire, we
> should endeavor to put them away. You can't arrest someone for thinking
> about something... yet. Is this what you're advocating? Anyone that thinks
a
> subversive, illegal thought should go to jail?
>
>