vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Position on Hunting and Fishing Rights Amendment



>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:12:56 -0800
>To: RepTrail <RepTrail@infotrail.com>
>From: roger hayes <rhayes@turbonet.com>
>Subject: Re: Position on Hunting and Fishing Rights Amendment
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>Dear Rep. Trail:
>
>The addition of words to Idaho's Constitution is a very serious act.  One
>must be very cautious when adding, editing, or in any way changing it.  I
>feel this is social legislation at its very worst, designed to give
>benefit to a specific population of the state which is currently suffering
>no indignation, loss of freedom, and experiences little in way of
>prejudice. Why waste time and resources on it? Who is insisting that our
>legislature focus on this legislation? They must express undue power over
>our elected officials. This is disconcerting in a time when reform is
>knocking so heavily at government's door.
>
>I am very pleased with your support of education, campaign reform, and
>farm labor.  These are issues our state needs to address and I feel you
>bring enlightment to them, the political structure in Boise, and to the
>public at large.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Roger Hayes
>Moscow
>
>

Roger & Angela
838 E. 8th
Moscow, Id. 83843
208.882.3764





Back to TOC