vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: School District Cuts



Mr. Rush:
As a public entity the school district provides an annual audit of its $16 Million budget. So, there is a lot of data. Certain judgments have to be made that can color the figures one direction or another depending on what we're looking for. For example, does the Activities Director's salary
and benefits get added into the "administrators" expense item, or does it go into the "activities" expense. Or both, but it only gets added once? I will get back to you with the numbers for last year (actual dollars spent/received) in the more general (and understandable) categories and we'll see what additional areas you and others would like to see.
Mike Curleyb




On 3 Dec 01, at 19:00, Mike Rush wrote:

Date forwarded: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:01:47 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mike Rush" <mike.rush@veriomail.com>
To: "Ron Force" <rforce@moscow.com>, <vision2020@moscow.com>
Subject: Re: School District Cuts
Date sent: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:00:16 -0700
Forwarded by: vision2020@moscow.com

You stated that most $ goes to salaries... Any information on actual budget
numbers. Where the $ go, how much is available, and where it comes from?

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Force" <rforce@moscow.com>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: School District Cuts


> Here's some numbers to think about. They come from the official Idaho
> School District Profiles:
>
> 1990 2000
> Enrollment 2714 2624
> Ave. Daily Attendance 2565 2471
> Elementary Teachers 74.47 82
> Secondary Teachers 76.09 85.2
> Administrators 8 16
> Other Certified Staff 23.1 16
> Total Certified 181.7 200.08
> Non-Certified Staff 65.9 101.49
>
> Unfortunately, like the university, most of the expenditures is in
salaries.
> If you have to reduce the budget substantially, it means cutting
positions.
> There may be a rational explanation for growing staff while enrollment
> declines: 1990 was woefully understaffed; mandates for special programs,
> etc.
>
> Anyone want to weigh in?
>
> ********************************************
> Ron Force rforce@moscow.com
> Moscow ID USA
> ********************************************
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hayfields@moscow.com [mailto:hayfields@moscow.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:40 PM
> > To: vision2020@moscow.com
> > Subject: School District Cuts
> >
> > <snip> The very idea of cutting one single teacher while after
> > school sports
> > programs are kept infuriates me. The time to talk about cutting the
best
> > resource - our very skilled and competent teachers should be
> > after everything
> > else is gutted. <snip>
> > Heather
> > Jordan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent by First Step Internet.
> > http://www.fsr.net/
> >
> >
>




Back to TOC