Re: School District Cuts

["Mike Rush" <mike.rush@veriomail.com>]

You stated that most $ goes to salaries...  Any information on actual budget
numbers.  Where the $ go, how much is available, and where it comes from?

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Force" <rforce@moscow.com>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: School District Cuts


> Here's some numbers to think about.  They come from the official Idaho
> School District Profiles:
>
> 1990 2000
> Enrollment 2714 2624
> Ave. Daily Attendance 2565 2471
> Elementary Teachers 74.47 82
> Secondary Teachers 76.09 85.2
> Administrators 8 16
> Other Certified Staff 23.1 16
> Total Certified 181.7 200.08
> Non-Certified Staff 65.9 101.49
>
> Unfortunately, like the university, most of the expenditures is in
salaries.
> If you have to reduce the budget substantially, it means cutting
positions.
> There may be a rational explanation for growing staff while enrollment
> declines: 1990 was woefully understaffed; mandates for special programs,
> etc.
>
> Anyone want to weigh in?
>
> ********************************************
> Ron Force         rforce@moscow.com
> Moscow ID USA
> ********************************************
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hayfields@moscow.com [mailto:hayfields@moscow.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:40 PM
> > To: vision2020@moscow.com
> > Subject: School District Cuts
> >
> > <snip>  The very idea of cutting one single teacher while after
> > school sports
> > programs are kept infuriates me.  The time to talk about cutting the
best
> > resource - our very skilled and competent teachers should be
> > after everything
> > else is gutted. <snip>
> > Heather
> > Jordan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent by First Step Internet.
> >            http://www.fsr.net/
> >
> >
>