interesting read!

["Shahab Mesbah" <meteor2@moscow.com>]

Here is another interesting view.

"Your brother in arms"
Shahab...



Living Purposefully in a Time of Violence
Holly Hanson
Mount Holyoke College
September 13, 2001

"When a thought of war comes, oppose it with a stronger thought of peace."1

	I want to look ahead from grief, and sorrow, and shock, and talk about
action. I want us to consider why people are angry at the United States. We
empower ourselves with knowledge, and we heal ourselves with action that has
a purpose and has consequences.
	To seek to understand violence is not to condone it. Violence makes things
simple, because it is wrong, and we know it is wrong, and therefore to
punish the perpetrators of violence is right. But we can look to the history
of any war to see that aggression harms the way people think, and limits
their possibilities, for a long time after the war, for generations. In
addition to retribution, we also need to think about justice, because that
is a bigger question, and it involves all of us. Most of us are not able to
find and punish terrorists. But all of us can take actions that create
justice in the world.

	Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, described the
condition of the world in this way in his report to the Millenium
Conference. 15% of the world's population are well-off on a world scale, 7%
are in between, and 78% are poor. Calculated another way, 20 percent of the
people have 86% of the wealth, which means 80 percent of the people have 14%
of the wealth.2  Eighty percent of the people of the world have only
fourteen percent of the wealth of the world. This inequality is getting
greater, and many people have experienced deterioration in their capacity to
sustain themselves over the past generation or so.   What I mean by this is
that people who are farmers are hungrier and they work harder. People who
have educations and work at salaried jobs are losing their ability to
sustain themselves with their work, and cannot find for their children the
education they themselves received. Today, we feel more afraid in our lives,
but violence perpetrated by the desperately poor is part of people's
everyday lives in many parts of the world. Half of humanity lives on less
than two dollars a day.  People who experience this, or who see it around
them, can look at the level of consumption of North Americans and find it to
be obscene. That we can live our lives as we do, and expend wealth as we do,
oblivious of the poverty of half the human race, is obscene. Kofi Annan
said,  "Extreme poverty is an affront to our common humanity. It also makes
many other problems worse."  People see this extreme poverty as unjust. And
many people see the United States making, and sustaining, the rules that
keep it that way.

	Imagine some people are playing Monopoly. They play for awhile, and buy
almost all the property, and then you join the game. You say, "give me some
property, so I can play." They say, "no, you have to buy property." You say,
"that's not fair." They say, "we can't help it, those are the rules." "You
say, but I can never win if you already own all the property". They say,
"the game only works if people play by the rules."
	In a very real sense in the world we live in, some people make the rules
that everybody has to play by. And if everyone had an equal voice in making
the rules, the rules would be different. Antibiotics can reduce aids
transmission rates by 50%, and tuberculosis drugs can reduce aids death
rates by 30 %, and anti-retroviral drugs keep people alive.  Many, many
people in the world want these medicines to be produced generically, to be
available to everyone who needs them. But this country is among those that
have upheld the primacy of intellectual property rights, so people die
because they do not have access to medicine which exists, which could save
them, which other people in the world receive. This year, five thousand
Africans are dieing every day of AIDS. That is 35 thousand deaths every
week, one hundred and forty seven thousand deaths every month, more than
four million in the year. As we are experiencing the enormity of unnecessary
death in this country, and mourning the loss of people we knew, and people
we did not know, that can help us to wrap our minds around the tragedy of
AIDS, and understand why people are angry at us for the rules we uphold.

	What is essential to keep in mind is that the deep division between rich
and poor which we think of as the North and the South, the developed and the
developing, the first world and the third world, is a relatively new thing
in historical terms. It is not natural, things have not always been this
way.  There is only one world. The parts of it came to have the
characteristics they now have in interaction with each other, mostly over
the last six hundred years. Think of it like a human body that begins to
focus its capacity to grow in a few areas, depriving other areas of
resources. Imagine that this sickness of uneven growth continues for a long
time in the human body: the parts of it receiving more than their share of
resources become deformed and swollen. The parts of the body deprived of
resources become atrophied, those body parts don't function. As long as the
unbalanced distribution of nutrients is not treated, the disease will get
worse. This is the condition of the world we live in. It is sick, it has
been sick for a long time, and all of our efforts to heal it do not work,
because we are not recognizing the systemic nature of the illness. In fact,
we invest a tremendous amount of energy in not noticing the systemic nature
of the illness. Think about the last few years, and how we have responded to
the manifestations of the world's unbalanced growth.  When we hear about
violence in Liberia, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Bosnia, do we think about it as their
war, caused by their intolerance? A war in Angola, which people did not
choose for themselves, has been going on for 25 years.   In Sudan, 2 million
people have died and 5 million have been displaced by war that has lasted
for forty years, off and on. A war began in the Congo in 1997; and in the
last two years, three million people, almost all non-combatants, have died
because of this war. And the world has looked away, and said, it is their
problem. But it is our problem, not merely because of our common humanity,
but because our economic and social and political lives are deeply,
intimately connected with those of all the people of the world, and they
have been, for a long time.

	An untreated disease gets worse, the symptoms spread into the parts of the
body that did not appear to be infected before. I think this is how we need
to understand the destruction of the World Trade center and the attack on
the Pentagon. These attacks are terrible tragedies. The people who died were
innocent, and the people who caused it have to be punished.  But attacking
terrorists is not enough. It is not an adequate response. We can recognize
the possibility of truly making the world safe from terrorism, if we
recognize that the underlying cause of terrorism is related to the
underlying cause of war in the Congo, and the despair which gets labeled as
religious or ethnic violence. The fundamental cause of all of this death and
violence is the appalling heritage of a few centuries of unequal
development. The world does not have to be the way we have made it.

	Since people created these conditions, people can also change them. And the
people who can change them is everyone, it is us. We change the conditions
of the world by changing the way we act in the world. Think of the unfair
monopoly game. It does not take a revolution to make the game fairer, it
just takes people changing the way they play it. Did you ever play monopoly
and give away property to make the game last longer? We can do that, in the
real world. We can change the rules so they are fair for everyone. Forgiving
the debt of the poorest nations would do this. Making voting at the United
Nations more equitable would do this. Taxing international financial
transactions and using that wealth to build infrastructure in the poorest
parts of the world could do it. The world has 345  billionaires. The total
combined worth of those 345 people is greater than the GDP of countries in
the world whose total population accounts for more than half the world's
population. They could be taxed on international transactions, and that
wealth could be used to assist those who are most disadvantaged by global
economic activity, and the billionaires would still be ok. They'd  still be
comfortable. And, we would all be safer.

 	Moving the world to a place where people have less reason to be angry at
the United States is not just the responsibility of governments, or the UN.
We, as ordinary people, have  tremendous power to make the world more
equitable. We are the cells and the sinews and the bone of the tightly
integrated, coherent organism which is the world, and all our actions have
an effect far beyond ourselves. We have power as consumers, and if we choose
to, we can use that power to create equitable working conditions for the
producers of the goods we consume. We have tremendous power as citizens of a
democratic society, and if we choose to use it, we can wield that power to
elect leaders who recognize and are committed to transforming the
fundamental imbalances that burden the world. Because we have freedom of
expression in this country, we can hold our leaders accountable if they fail
to act in ways that benefit the whole of humanity. We are only empowered to
take these actions if we understand, if we can see ourselves as part of an
organically connected world. So we change the world when we work to change
ourselves, and the way we think.

	All of these actions are powerful, all of them are effective. Think about
the abolition of slavery. The widespread and systematic enslavement of
Africans was  a large part of what created the world's current imbalance,
and there was a time, not so very long ago, when people thought of slavery
as natural and inevitable. Just the same way that we make global inequality
natural and inevitable when we say first world, third world, traditional and
modern. But some people came to realize that slavery was not natural, it was
not  acceptable,  and they resolved to change it. They took actions which
did not seem to be in their own material best interest.  They began a war of
ideas, saying that what people accepted as normal, and moral, was in fact
abnormal and immoral. They changed the way they thought, they changed the
way they acted in the world. and the world changed. We can do the same
thing.

	We can decide that the extremes of wealth and poverty in the world are
entirely unacceptable. We can systematically, deliberately intervene to
change those conditions by the way we participate in the economy, the way we
participate in the government of our own country, and in the way we
participate in the life of society.  This is our capacity, it is our
responsibility, and no one can prevent us from exercising that capacity, if
we recognize that we have it.