Re: Regional hospital

["Sue Hovey" <suehovey@moscow.com>]

Nice response to my query, Jeff.  I think it is important to recognize the
high road taken just might not lead to consolidation, but it could lead to
more shared services and equipment.  Actually, some of that is already
happening and probably will continue.  I used to think consolidation would
be a boon to both communities.  After doing a lot of reading, discussing,
and listening to the several sides of this very complicated issue, I no
longer believe that. I, for one, am perfectly willing to let it rest, at
least for now.

Sue
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Goebel <goebel@palouse.net>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: Regional hospital


> I've been asked why as a skilled mediator I biased my message with a line
or
> two that allows readers to infer that I have the interests of the two
> communities uppermost while those who oppose a consolidation are either
> afraid or less high minded.  Good question so I am sharing this with
> everyone.
>
> I asked this question as a citizen, not a facilitator.  I am really
wanting
> to understand.  I've been told there is no hope of seeing our communities
> join together.  I am very disappointed because it means I have to pay a
lot
> for half, or less, of the service.
>
> So, my question deepens, beyond hospitals.  Is it possible for communities
> to look to the greater good, or function at the highest denominator,
versus
> the lowest denominator of the communities?
>
> Of course, I have seen the "yes" answer to this in other groups and
> communities I have worked with.  However, this is "my" community and I'd
> like to see us take the high road.  That's why I wrote to the "visionary"
> group.  I expect a lot from this group.
>
> Thanks.  Jeff
>
> Carl Jeffry Goebel
> Goebel and Associates
> Web page: www.aboutlistening.com
>