vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Regional hospital



Can you be more specific about WHO the unhappy people are?  
have you spoken with the Board at Gritman, Liz Molina is the chair, to
get  clear and accurate information about decision already made and the
results of feasibility study?


Jeff Goebel wrote:
> 
> How can something be resolved if people are unhappy?  In my experience, at
> the very least, unhappy people snip or boycott, and at the other end, they
> topple the existing power structure.  Jeff
> 
> Carl Jeffry Goebel
> Goebel and Associates
> Web page: www.aboutlistening.com
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   John Danahy [mailto:JDANAHY@turbonet.com]
> Sent:   Sunday, November 26, 2000 5:08 PM
> To:     vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject:        Re: Regional hospital
> 
> First I would like to say that this issue has been resolved, despite some
> people being unhappy with the resolution.  The two hospital boards spent
> several years trying to come to a joint solution for what is essentially a
> PMH problem and could not fashion an answer that would be beneficial to all
> parties.
> 
>  I do not believe that building one hospital in the corridor will hold down
> costs, but will rather create a monopolistic situation controlled by a few.
> While I agree that some costs could be shared, especially high cost "new
> tech items"  health care is still a one on one experience where each
> individual must be happy with the choices available.  Limiting choices to
> one is not in the best interest of either community.
> 
> John
> 
> John and Laurie Danahy
> jdanahy@turbonet.com




Back to TOC