RE: Regional hospital

["Jeff Goebel" <goebel@palouse.net>]

Maree,

You sent this note to me, however, the reference to unhappy people was from
John, so he'd have to answer the WHO he had in mind.

As I have been learning from this dialogue, there seems to be a lot of
unhappy people.  I appreciated learned about the study today which Armond
Larive sent a synopsis of today.  Was everyone else familiar with the
results of that study?

Thanks.  Jeff

Carl Jeffry Goebel
Goebel and Associates
Web page: www.aboutlistening.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maree McHugh [mailto:mchumare@turbonet.com]
Sent:	Monday, November 27, 2000 5:57 PM
To:	goebel@palouse.net
Cc:	'John Danahy'; vision2020@moscow.com
Subject:	Re: Regional hospital

Can you be more specific about WHO the unhappy people are?
have you spoken with the Board at Gritman, Liz Molina is the chair, to get
clear and accurate information about decision already made and the results
of feasibility study?


Jeff Goebel wrote:
>
> How can something be resolved if people are unhappy?  In my experience, at
> the very least, unhappy people snip or boycott, and at the other end, they
> topple the existing power structure.  Jeff
>
> Carl Jeffry Goebel
> Goebel and Associates
> Web page: www.aboutlistening.com
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   John Danahy [mailto:JDANAHY@turbonet.com]
> Sent:   Sunday, November 26, 2000 5:08 PM
> To:     vision2020@moscow.com
> Subject:        Re: Regional hospital
>
> First I would like to say that this issue has been resolved, despite some
> people being unhappy with the resolution.  The two hospital boards spent
> several years trying to come to a joint solution for what is essentially a
> PMH problem and could not fashion an answer that would be beneficial to
all
> parties.
>
>  I do not believe that building one hospital in the corridor will hold
down
> costs, but will rather create a monopolistic situation controlled by a
few.
> While I agree that some costs could be shared, especially high cost "new
> tech items"  health care is still a one on one experience where each
> individual must be happy with the choices available.  Limiting choices to
> one is not in the best interest of either community.
>
> John
>
> John and Laurie Danahy
> jdanahy@turbonet.com