Florida case involves on-line anonymity

["bill london" <bill_london@hotmail.com>]

The Florida court case below focuses on posted anonymous accusations, and 
whether or not the identities of those who post such statements should be 
made public.  Sound similar to the "Timothy Egan" postings to V2020?
BL
--
>
>APBnews.com
>May 26, 2000, Friday
>
>Ruling Could Strip Online Anonymity
>By David Noack
>
>DATELINE: MIAMI
>
>In a ruling that could force anonymous online posters into the open, a
>Florida judge has ordered America Online and Yahoo to reveal the writers of
>allegedly defamatory messages.
>
>Dade County Circuit Court Judge Eleanor Schockett's ruling was made 
>Thursday
>in a lawsuit by a former shipping company executive who claims he was
>libeled on message boards hosted by the two online companies. AOL and 
>Yahoo,
>protected by earlier court rulings that Internet service providers [ISPs]
>are not publishers, are not defendants in the case.
>
>If Schockett's order is upheld on appeal, contributors to online 
>discussions
>could find themselves weighing their words more carefully. Critics say it
>would be the end of uninhibited speech on the Internet, where contributors
>can have their say without revealing their identities.
>
>Financial message boards have become popular forums for anonymous posters 
>to
>discuss not only stock prices, but also how companies are run, with sharp
>criticism often directed at executives or boards of directors. Corporations
>have begun following the discussions and sometimes suing online posters for
>their comments.
>
>Unknown defendants
>
>J. Erik Hvide filed suit against his anonymous critics after being fired as
>the head of Hvide Marine Inc. His attorney, Bruce D. Fischman of Miami, 
>said
>he had been the target of a yearlong campaign that accused him of
>mismanagement and even criminal behavior. The company later filed for
>bankruptcy.
>
>"He hired our law firm to sue the anonymous posters for defamation, libel
>and for intentional interference with a business relationship -- except the
>defendants are unknown, and we needed to find out who they were," Fischman
>said.
>
>He said the judge had to balance the right to make anonymous accusations
>online with the right of someone to face their accuser.
>
>Fischman subpoenaed AOL and Yahoo, seeking the identities of eight 
>anonymous
>posters with screen names such as "justthefactsjack." The judge rejected a
>motion by Fort Lauderdale lawyer Christopher K. Leigh to quash the
>subpoenas.
>
>The judge gave the two companies 20 days to turn over the names.
>
>'A masked opponent'
>
>If Leigh decides to appeal the decision, he could ask an appellate court to
>stay Schockett's order. Leigh could not be reached for comment today.
>
>Clifford A. Wolff, who represents Yahoo, said the company would not take a
>position on the issue and probably wouldn't contest the order.
>
>Fischman called the ruling a victory for the victims of anonymous attacks.
>
>"Up until now, they have been really been fighting a masked opponent," he
>said. "How do you take their deposition, how do you settle with them, how 
>do
>you determine what their motives are, how do you litigate the case?"
>
>Fischman stressed that he is not trying to chill or curtail anonymous 
>online
>postings, but that in this case, the message board writers overstepped the
>boundary between legitimate criticism and reckless allegations.
>
>"We are not saying that individuals can't post anonymously. We are not
>saying that individuals can't criticize," Fischman said. "Absolutely, there
>is a First Amendment right for people to speak, and if people choose to be
>anonymous, they can speak any way they chose to speak.
>
>"However, if they damage somebody, if they injure somebody, if they commit
>libel or interfere with a business relationship, then they can be held
>responsible and disclose who they are."
>
>ACLU backs anonymity
>
>Christopher Hansen, a senior national staff counsel with the American Civil
>Liberties Union, called Hvide's suit frivolous. The ACLU filed a
>friend-of-the-court brief in the case, weighing in on the side of the
>posters.
>
>"One of the advantages of the Internet is having access to a huge audience.
>We have to tread carefully on the Internet and ensure that it has breathing
>room it needs," Hansen said.
>
>Lyrissa Lidsky, an associate professor of law at the University of Florida
>in Gainesville who helped write the ACLU brief, said that over the last
>couple of years, companies have been going after online posters.
>
>"There was an important principle at stake," Lidsky said. "How much of a
>right do Internet users have to speak anonymously online?"
>
>She questions whether the online comments cited by Hvide were defamatory or
>merely speculation that the company was in financial straits.
>
>Lidsky compared the suit to what have become known as SLAPP actions -- an
>acronym for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. Critics say 
>that
>some corporations have tried to mire legitimate critics in litigation that
>can be costly for individuals even if they ultimately prevail.
>
>David Noack is an APBnews.com staff writer.

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com