vision2020
Camas Prairie Railroad
- To: "Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Camas Prairie Railroad
- From: "Wayne H Beebe" <whbeebe@turbonet.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 20:58:47 -0800
- Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 20:49:08 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <kUKe6.A.KDM.wGPo4@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Last night on NWPR it was announced that the CPRR will be
abandoning its rail line from Lewiston to Grangeville. The use does not
justify the cost of upkeep. When I first heard about this I thought this
would be a golden opportunity for rails to trails.
Some one just proposed that as an alternative to an freeway
highway a light rail system might be better--myself, I would prefer a fast rail
system that would connect Southern Idaho with Northern Idaho. But this
would also entail some environmental degradation in the very areas that people
want to preserve--the Salmon River and Whitebird (to say nothing about the
Lewiston grade).
Northern Idaho has continued to be cut off from its Southern
half. The current highway was not designed for the traffic it handles and
the result is it is now the most dangerous highway in the region. As much
as we may want to limit progress, will happen or it will pass us by--already
Swift will not allow its trucks to use highway 95. As we argue about the
pros and cons of a highway expansion BSU continues to siphon educational
programs from the U of I. If we want to take advantage of NAFTA we need to
have a system that will allow for the most efficient movement of commerce in the
area. Why should trucks have to go around the horn through Pendleton or up
into Montana to move Idaho commerce north or south? Why do cars have to
risk being run off the road by large trucks? Why are we allowing our citizens
to be killed on a goat trail?
I am very much for the environment as anyone on this board,
but I do think we have to find a balance that will provide a safe road and which
will allow for the free flow of commerce while protecting the integrity of the
region.
Back to TOC