vision2020
being right
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: being right
- From: Marc <cram3813@uidaho.edu>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 03:28:27 -0700
- Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 03:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"zp_7JD.A.WFG.v7ch3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Ah, the turmoil. When I stated my stance of being politically right (never
politically correct!) I anticipated not the response it caused. My
statements were right in defining my rightness, but please don't wrongly
read too much into them. From a very basic position, semantics and
definitions are very important for communication--how else are we to
discuss something if we are not sure that we are discussing the same thing?
But seriously, everyone, don't be so serious. Lighten up!! I meant my
response part as factual, part as jest. (Or maybe it was satire. I must
get out my dictionary and be sure I am using the right word before I
confuse myself.)
Existing rightly (definitely not sinisterly!),
Marc
Back to TOC