vision2020
Health Notice
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Health Notice
- From: "bill london" <bill_london@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:27:24 PST
- Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:28:46 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"R0Paw.A.Lw.2cjn2"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
here's an advance copy of an article I wrote for the February issue of
the Moscow Food Co-op's newsletter. BL
--
On Wednesday, January 6, subscribers to the Moscow-Pullman Daily News
also received a tan single-sheet advertising insert in their newspapers
(headlined "Health Notice") that attacked organic foods as a serious
health risk.
The claims made in that advertisement were totally bogus.
The warning presented in that ad was that the US Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) had compiled "recent data" that indicated that "people who
eat organic and 'natural' foods are eight times as likely as the rest of
the population to be attacked by a deadly new strain of E. coli bacteria
(O157:H7)." That statement just ain't true.
I called the CDC (their phone number is 800-311-3435) and talked with
the media relations office. I was told that the CDC has never compiled
data about any bacteria outbreaks comparing organic and non-organic food
sources. The press officer explained that the CDC had been fielding
calls on this topic ever since the claims repeated in the Daily News
were originally printed. The CDC had created a public statement on this
issue, which they obligingly sent to me.
The CDC statement is short, and includes the following core message: The
CDC "has not conducted any study that compares or quantifies the
specific risk of infection with E. coli O157:H7 and eating either
traditionally produced or organic/natural foods."
So how did this bogus statement about the CDC finding organic food
dangerous get into print? Well, the statement was originally written by
Dennis T. Avery. Avery is an employee of the Hudson Institute, a very
wealthy think-tank with a strong pro-agribusiness perspective. I
visited the institute's website (www.hudson.org). They don't list their
sources of funding, but I checked out the board of directors. The board
includes representatives from across the American corporate elite, many
from chemical and advertising companies. For example, some board
members are: Dan Quayle, former Republican Vice-President; Thomas Bell,
CEO of Young & Rubican ad agency; Linden Blue, vice-chairman of General
Atomics; Mitchell Daniels, senior vice-president of Eli Lilly & Company;
and Thomas Donahue, CEO of the US Chamber of Commerce.
Avery is the author of the book (I swear that I am not making this up)
entitled: "Saving the World with Pesticides and Plastics".
So, it started with Avery making this claim about the danger of organic
food in print in the Hudson Institute's magazine, American Outlook, in
the fall of 1998. He and his corporate friends managed to get the Wall
Street Journal to publish five paragraphs from the article on the
editorial page in the December 8, 1998 edition.
Then these people who are so anxious to discredit organic foods could
write that this statement appeared in the Wall Street Journal. The
statement is so bogus that the reporters from the Journal would never
have written it. The only place it appeared was in the editorial page
in the tiny "quotable" column, which is about the size and credibility
of a letter to the editor. But they could now wrap this statement in
the respectability of the Journal.
Then they spread this out to their supporters, including some in Moscow,
who paid to have it put in our newspaper.
Perhaps this all proves that you can't always believe everything you
read. Or maybe it indicates that if you have enough money, you can get
the most outrageous things printed.
Which reminds me of another aspect of this story that still bothers me.
While I fully support the rights of anyone to buy advertising space in
the Daily News, I think the newspaper was remiss in not clearly labeling
the insert a paid advertisement. The page was headed only by the words,
"Health Notice," and as a whole, looked semi-official, like it was a
real warning and not a political diatribe.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Back to TOC