vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

RE: dogs and unreasonable searches



E:  I like the one about putting a bullet through the head of the criminal
after a high speed chase but the idea drunk drivers should be hung should
only apply after their second offense (I think you may have been a little
harsh on that one).

PC

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Erikus4@aol.com [SMTP:Erikus4@aol.com]
	Sent:	November 20,1998 19:48
	To:	vision2020@moscow.com
	Subject:	dogs and unreasonable searches

	>These searches are also productive and have true foundations in
	>the law, or else they would not be allowed at all.

	Whatever the government does must be correct, eh?  I don't give a
damn how 
	productive they are.  They are unreasonable.

	You know what would be productive.  After every high-speed chase the
cops 
	should just put a bullet in the head of the criminal.  All drunk
drivers
	should 
	be taken out back and hung.  Speeders - chop a finger off.  But that
would be 
	absolutely oppressive.

	>Public safety should know no boundaries and based upon probable
cause law
	>enforcement generally has very few boundaries.  I feel safer
knowing that the
	>police are looking out for my family's safety to the best of their
abilities.

	"Best of their abilities"?  See above for new and improved, sure to
stop crime
	punishments.

	"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it
is the
	argument 
	of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." 
	- William Pitt

	E. O'Daniel




Back to TOC