vision2020
Re: public water, private profit
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: public water, private profit
- From: "Brent Capener" <cape@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:02:36 -0800
- Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:02:46 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <W4Q5eC.A.YMB.i7c09@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
There is another
slant to this issue that I expected to read on this listserve by
now. Are Naylor farms actually planning to use the water for
farming? Many fortunes have been made by being first in line at claiming
rights to valuable, limited resources and then reselling those rights.
. Maxxam Corp. (sp) makes far more money by threatening to (and then not)
cutting Redwoods, and having rights to (but not using) electricity than they
would if they followed their supposed business plans. Many "gold claimers"
made off much better by selling claims than actually mucking for gold.
Currently, water rights are the hot item, with lots of money changing hands in
the more arid and wealthy southwestern states. I would very much like our
state regulators (and the feds) to get off their bum, stop passing the buck, and
make sure water mining doesn't happen in our
state.
BC
-----Oh dang that liberal
elitist evil twin of mine-------
Back to TOC