vision2020
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Moscow Civic Association



Melynda,
 
You wrote that government is the "effective regulator" of commerce and industry. But civil government is incapable of even regulating the making of a pencil (see the irenic article I Pencil: http://www.self-gov.org/freeman/9605read.html).
 
Also, I would argue that if the government is the regulator, then ownership is in name only.
 
Tell me, who really owns my house (when I own it outright)? If I were not to pay my property taxes, what then? The state comes and confiscates it and sells it. At that point, my ownership is in actuality just renting from the state.
 
And finally, do I really own my house when I am told what I can and cannot do with it? I cannot even put a deck on my house without getting governmental approval to do so. I cannot setup a grey-water system without jumping thru all of the regulatory hoops that add $10,000 to the cost of the system!
 
My point in my above rant (a raw nerve for this economic libertarian) is that when governments are the "effective regulator", they are not effective (see Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations); and they in reality do own it (even though they let us pretend that we do).
 
Pax,
Dale
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Melynda Huskey
To: Dale Courtney ; vision2020@moscow.com
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Moscow Civic Association

Dear Dale,
 
Progressivism promotes government as an effective regulator of commerce and industry, but does not call for the public or collective ownership of the means of production.
 
Best,
 
Melynda
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Dale Courtney
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:29 AM
To: vision2020@moscow.com
Subject: RE: Moscow Civic Association
 
Melynda Huskey wrote:
> The progressive movement was/is "a reform movement (beginning
> in the first
> decades of the 20th century)  principally focused on the role of the
> government (local, state, and national) in alleviating the
> economic and
> social disarray brought about by the rapid urbanization and
> industrialization of America." 

Can you please tell me the difference between this definition and that
of socialism?

Dale Courtney
Moscow, Idaho
Free to be me, free to be you (as long as you agree with Tom Hansen...)


Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com




Back to TOC