vision2020
RE: Free enterprise
- To: <lucyzoe@moscow.com>, <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: RE: Free enterprise
- From: thansen@moscow.com
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:31:06 GMT
- Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <f3i2qC.A.VbX.wL4i9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Greetings Visionaires -
Lucy Zoe stated:
> Are you saying that invoking your rights as a property owner
> is racist and it perpetuates oppression? So, if I come home
> and someone is sitting on my couch, and I ask them to leave,
> I'm racist and oppressive?
No. In that instance you are not a racist. That person sitting on your couch
is possibly guilty of breaking and entering (or at least trespass). If he
refuses to leave after you tell him to leave, I assume he is still guilty of
trespass.
> Where do you draw the line Rosemary? And I'm not talking about
> Lesbians holding hands, so don't go there. I'm asking you how
> a property owner can exercise his/her ownership without being
> labeled a racist and an oppressor? Who gets to draw the line?
This brings up a very interesting question. If a proprietor has a sign
conspicuously posted that readss "We reserve the right to refuse service to
anyone", how much legal protection does that sign provide if he/she simply
refuses to serve a group of fully decked out klansmen (without giving any
reason? If the proprietor is totally protected against any criminal or civil
litigation when he/she simply refuses to serve somebody for absolutely no
reason at all, this could develop serious problems within a community.
Curiouser and curiouser,
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.net/
Back to TOC