Re: Buy some Q-tips.

["Doug Jones" <credenda@moscow.com>]

Joan Opyr wrote:

>
> This question is nearly as tired as that backgammon/checkers metaphor.
>

It's supposed to be tiresome because that's how tiresomely most of the
Vision 2020 disagreements proceed. And that's how community discussions will
flounder until we rise above these playground replies. The
checkers-backgammon criterion is used to weed out the boring, unhelpful
criticisms. Are you really wanting to embrace the view that "arguments" like
"secularism is wrong because the Koran says so" and "Christianity is wrong
because it sins against Abstract Equality" are interesting criticisms? You
can do better than that.

Doug Jones