vision2020
Another Review of the Women's Rally
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Another Review of the Women's Rally
- From: "Doug Jones" <credenda@moscow.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 20:37:23 -0700
- Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <WAAwkB.A.ZET.mkLR9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Dear Visionaries,
I, too, attended the "women's" rally, and though I
don't share the organizers' ideology (I'm a Credenda/Agenda editor after all), I
am certainly NO defender of the topless ordinance, for reasons given in a
previous post. I am surprised that some
commenting on the rally have been so giddy about its success. Even if I had
shared their vision, I would have been embarrassed to my toes.
Speaker after speaker lamented about how the
"progressive" community of Moscow is so unorganized, as if that were its real
problem. Yet staring them in the face at this rally was a vision that would fail
to inspire anyone but the most devoted ideologue. Even the most organized group
can't get excited about grey oatmeal. The clash between alleged "progressivism"
and the truckloads of tiresome cliches was unbelievable; the rally even began
with overused music. Where are the new categories, the fresh vision, the
creativity? I get exasperated and angry at right wing/Republican rallies for
countless stupidities, but this rally just bored me.
Speaker after speaker invoked the
same reverent appeal to divine Equality (Praise Be Unto It) to answer every
perceived question. Some on this list have assured us that secular ethical
standards are complex and subtle intricacies of history, subjectivity, etc., but
none of that reared its head here. All we heard against every suggestion of
difference was a brute deduction of from the unchanging Moral Absolute of
Equality. And just like at the recent anti-Fred-Phelps rally (see that review at
www.credenda.org/old/rainbowrally.html),
this Abstract Equality clashed regularly with Abstract Freedom, often within the
same speeches. Of course, no one blinked at the constant clashes of these
values, calls for freedom that sought radical difference and uniqueness for
individuals, right next to the more dominant calls for unbounded equality that
pushed for the elimination of all differences, or as one speaker put it --
"erase the differences
between the sexes." Back and forth it went, difference/no difference, on and on,
the same Roberspierrean clash we've been hearing since the birth of the
Enlightenment. This they call progressivism.
The speakers found it very important to repeatedly
assure us that this was an important issue; that line started sounding like the
magician who keeps telling us that the glass is ordinary. My favorite argument
was one of the last speakers who told us that "what goes
on here is really important because it is." I also always find it curious that
multicultural proponents such as those here were so quick with the insults to
other primitive cultures; burka this and burka that digs were so common it felt
like a Gordon Liddy show at times. Their sensitivity is selective apparently. I
especially enjoyed the speaker who after genuflecting and invoking abstract
equality as required went on to condemn America's selling of bodies, especially
women's bodies -- selling women to "fuel the machine of capitalism." But she
apparently didn't know or chose to sidestep the fact that these local women were
doing just that. They were collecting cash for toplessness, not just expressing
themselves. Progressives defending the machine of capitalism was intriguing.
City Councilperson Peg Hamlett helped tone down
some of the anti-money anger against having to pay for an election, and she
offered a reasonable alternative to the ordinance that focused on "lewd acts"
rather than "breasts." Immediately the crowd burst into anger against her
Taliban desire to impose her morality on the rest of us. Just kidding. You can
apparently impose morality if you have the right credentials. She was applauded.
Even the woman with the "keep your laws off my body" placard did not mind
submitting to Peg Hamlett's law. But this sort of move makes all the hysterical
replies against "imposing morality" ring hollow. It turns out just to be another
progressive hypocrisy. And all the cliches and hypocrisies and value
contradictions add up into one tiresome vision.
The organizer kept praising the turnout of 170, now
I hear the number has grown to 200 "supporters" who showed up out of population
of 28,000(?). Several times the crowd was praised for being progressive, but the
stranger next to me told me he showed up to see the "cops wrestle with topless
women." Another friend overheard some guys behind her asking "when are the girls
gonna take off their shirts." Thus progressivism meets Jerry Springer. Jerry
Springer inspires ratings but you can't inspire a fight against injustice while
at the same time invoking an Equality that results in a Jerry Springer culture.
Yet that, apparently, is the progressive vision for Moscow. You don't need
ordinances to see a vision implode so sadly. Please have the courage to keep
standing up to the mike. We need more rallies like this.
Doug Jones
Back to TOC