vision2020
Gender specific ordinance
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Gender specific ordinance
- From: "Jennifer Swanberg" <jjswanberg@turbonet.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:56:54 -0700
- Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <RgofhC.A.ELM.anDP9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
John Guyer, et. al.,
Although males may use their breasts lewdly in public less frequently than
do women, women are no less deserving of constitutional equal protection
under the laws against such rare men.
Similarly, male molestation of children occurs at a much higher rate than
does molestation of children by women. Using your reasoning for voting down
the gender neutral alternative ordinance, we should not criminalize
molestation perpetrated
by women because it would dilute wording in laws relating to rape of a
minor.
If a person commits the crime of lewdness, let them be disciplined according
to their crime, regardless their gender.
Cheerios,
Jennifer
Jennifer J. Swanberg, M.Ed., NCC, MAC, LCPC
Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor
P.O. Box 9571
Moscow, Idaho 83843
jjswanberg@turbonet.com
(208) 882-6753
"There ain't no notes on a dulcimer, ye jus' play it!" - Old Joe Clark
Back to TOC