vision2020
Re: Ex-gays, non-discrimination, and rental concerns
- To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: Ex-gays, non-discrimination, and rental concerns
- From: "Archie" <archie@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:19:26 -0700
- References: <F191eQ4yFjguuvBADXR0002162c@hotmail.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <KU3rGC.A.ITH.xCTG9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
Thank you for your thoughtful, considerate replies. I appreciate it. The V is serving well in
providing a forum for this discussion. I am pleased "the Dougs" have decided to also participate,
as I have learned from them also.
-Archie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joan Opyr" <auntiestablishment@hotmail.com>
To: <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: Ex-gays, non-discrimination, and rental concerns
> Hello all--
>
> It's Monday morning, and I'm still not getting any work done on my book.
> Wonder why? Ah, well, here goes:
>
> 1) In enacting non-discrimination legislation, it doesn’t matter if
> homosexuality is a choice or not. Religion is a choice, and yet it’s a
> federally protected category. You might feel as if you were born a
> Catholic, a Mormon, or a Muslim, but you chose/choose that ongoing
> affiliation. And a landlord with a yen to discriminate might well argue
> that some religious practices are inherently dangerous: perhaps my North
> Carolina roots are showing, but snake handling and drinking poison leap to
> mind. If these seem a little remote, then how about the Christian Scientist
> who won’t be seeking medical treatment for that mysterious pain in his side?
> And perhaps a Jewish tenant is a little more likely than a Baptist to find
> that her home (i.e., your property) has been vandalized?
>
> Neither the "it's a choice" nor the "inherently dangerous lifestyle"
> argument will wash. No, homosexuality is not comparable to race, but if
> you're reasoning that we should extend protection to people of color because
> they didn't "choose" to be black, isn't the implication that they would be
> white if they could? Not an argument I'd care to be making.
>
> 2) Before contacting any of the ex-gay groups John Harrell cites in his
> post, I’d strongly recommend renting a documentary called "One Nation Under
> God." It’s about the founders of Exodus International, two gay men who left
> the group when they realized they’d fallen in love with one another. It
> offers some interesting insight into the "methodology" of many conversion
> groups (i.e., make-overs for lesbians and football lessons for gay men).
>
> As for Anne Heche, Sinead O’Connor, and Julie Cypher—-with the exception of
> Ms. Heche, who claims to have spent her lesbian years under the control of a
> space alien named Celestia, none of these women have described themselves as
> "coming out of homosexuality," and none have denounced or repudiated their
> time in same-sex relationships. As all three were involved with men before
> they became involved with women, I think Brad is correct when he says that
> it might be more accurate to call them bisexual rather than ex-gay.
>
> Here again, though, Ms. Heche is a potential exception: her autobiography is
> entitled "Call Me Crazy."
>
> Growing ever more skilled in work avoidance,
> Auntie Establishment
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
Back to TOC