vision2020
Re: Gay California teachers come out in the classroom
- To: <DonaldH675@aol.com>
- Subject: Re: Gay California teachers come out in the classroom
- From: Daniel Kronemann <kron4155@uidaho.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: <vision2020@moscow.com>
- In-Reply-To: <d8.190bb37d.2a3a3539@aol.com>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <POXQrB.A.FBI._VSC9@whale2.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I think Melynda put it as well as I could, so I'll do nothing more than
just endorse her statements. Save you all the time reading the say thing
twice.
Daniel
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 DonaldH675@aol.com wrote:
> John asks,
> >For example, can the government schools teach that God says that sodomy is
> >wrong?
>
> That's an easy one! No, a public school can't teach that God says sodomy is
> wrong. But it can teach that some religions hold that belief. Likewise, the
>
> schools can't teach that people of African descent aren't actually human,
> although the fact that some religions hold that belief (the World Church of
> the Creator, for example, and other so-called Christian Identity groups) can
> be discussed.
>
> Every religion -- and by religion I mean specifically "belief in and
> reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor
> of the universe, and systems grounded in such belief and worship" (American
> College Dictionary) -- makes a truth claim. Publically funded schools cannot
> mediate those competing truth claims.
>
> Refraining from endorsing one particular religious view does not amount to
> espousing another or competing religious view -- hence the impossibility of
> satisfying Doug Wilson's wish for an account of "what this worldview is from
> the defenders of it, or the enforcers of it." We have many standards, many
> theologies, many philosophies, and many worldviews. It's not a simple binary
> at all but an extraordinarily complex mixture of contingencies, compromises,
> dissatisfactions, and agreements. At the risk of repeating myself and boring
> others, I can only reiterate that we all pay for public education because we
> have established, as a nation, a public interest in universal education
> available to all, which we fund through taxes. That principle may not always
> hold: democratic action changes laws all the time. Knock yourself out.
>
> Melynda Huskey
>
Back to TOC