RE: Architects & Destructionists

["Tim Kinkeade" <kinkeade@moscow.com>]

John,
I am definitely interested in hearing your ideas for solutions.
Thanks.
Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: John Danahy [mailto:JDANAHY@turbonet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:39 PM
To: kinkeade@moscow.com; Vision2020
Subject: Re: Architects & Destructionists


It is difficult to work for solution that one does not agree with.  When the
"solution" proposed is, in reality, just maintaining the status quo, then
there is no solution.

John Danahy
jdanahy@turbonet.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Kinkeade" <kinkeade@moscow.com>
To: "Vision2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Architects & Destructionists


>
> Greetings,
> In light of the discussions of the upcoming levy it seems appropriate to
> make an observation.
>
> It is apparent that there is a handful of people on the list that are
> critical of "anything" the school district does.  Perhaps some even feel
> scorned by the district and this shows in their respective messages to the
> list.
>
> It is important to note that those who consistently coffer up criticism
are
> not the same group of people who are working on solutions.
>
> Are we part of the problem or are we part of the solution?
>
> Problem identification is as important as the solution.
>
> Shouldn't constructive criticism be accompanied by potential remedies?
>
> It is unfortunate that so many bright minds sit on the sidelines and
> criticize, as opposed to putting an equivalent amount of energy into
> solutions.
>
> Ultimately we all need to decide for ourselves, are we architects or are
we
> destructionists?
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>