vision2020

[Date Prev]	[Date Next]	[Thread Prev]	[Thread Next]
[Date Index]	[Thread Index]	[Author Index]	[Subject Index]

Re: Fwd: Re: Teaching alternative views

To: sean <o2design@wsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Teaching alternative views
From: Dale Goble <gobled@uidaho.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:31:42 -0800 (PST)
cc: <vision2020@moscow.com>
In-Reply-To: <a04310101b84036ee03c0@[134.121.92.198]>
Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:32:16 -0800 (PST)
Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
Resent-Message-ID: <5XeMWC.A.ipV.pvoG8@whale.fsr.net>
Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com



On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, sean wrote:

> Interestingly, scientific naturalism is seldom referred to as a
> religion.  Though it meets the demands of the word,



Gee, Sean, if we define the word "religion" that broadly then it applies
to everything -- and is effectively meaningless.

References:
- Fwd: Re: Teaching alternative views
  - From: sean <o2design@wsu.edu>

Prev by Date: Fwd: Re: Teaching alternative views
Next by Date: RE: Moscow's right/wrong conspiracy?
Prev by thread: Fwd: Re: Teaching alternative views
Next by thread: Just a Reminder
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to TOC