vision2020
Re: Digest
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Re: Digest
- From: Erikus4@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:09:00 EDT
- Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <BEmHSB.A.ytV.4bi84@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
> but all that I received was B.J. Swanson's posting re: Alturas. The
> Digest seems to be too digested (or abridged). Why is this so? I've noticed
> this before, but not always.
Your e-mail program may be showing you only the first part and possibly
requires that you download the rest. Some e-mail clients have this built-in
limit, or possibly it's set in the options somewhere.
You also might look VERY carefully. Sometimes a poster will quote the whole
damn message that he's replying to, and actual messages can get lost in
there. Today's digest has this a post like that... And it appears to be a
reply to a message which did the same thing...
Digests can be sent by either a time limit or a size limit. When we get a
digest with only four posts in it, like Issue 99, someone usually quoted
seven other messages in their reply.
E. O'Daniel
IDAHO!
Back to TOC