vision2020
vision2020-digest Digested.
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: vision2020-digest Digested.
- From: "Leo Ames" <leoames@moscow.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 16:10:23 -0700
- Resent-Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <IF3GiC.A.NuE.xx774@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I'm curious about the mechanicals of the vision2020 Digest. I recently
reduced my in-coming e-mails by subscribing to the digest instead of
receiving the individual postings. I thought I would get all of them in
clump in the digest version. However, that doesn't seem to be the case. For
instance, in today's digest, issue 98 "Today's Topics" list includes the
following:
----------
>vision2020-digest Digest Volume 00 : Issue 98
>
>Today's Topics:
> RE: Alturas [ "B. J. Swanson" <bjswan@moscow.com> ]
> Re: Alturas [ "Lois Melina" <lmelina@moscow.com> ]
> GIANT BOOK SALE TODAY--SATURDAY [ "Tim Hillebrand" <chief@synergetics ]
> Re: Alturas [ "Douglas Whitney" <dwhitney@moscow. ]
> Credit where credit is due, Roadless [ Bob Hassoldt <id4ster@yahoo.com> ]
>
...but all that I received was B.J. Swanson's posting re: Alturas. The
Digest seems to be too digested (or abridged). Why is this so? I've noticed
this before, but not always.
.... Leo Ames, Moscow
Back to TOC