vision2020
Fwd: School Taxes
- To: vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Fwd: School Taxes
- From: WMSteed@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:36:57 EST
- Resent-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 14:42:41 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <R7a0UC.A.XvU.LXYx4@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
In a message dated 3/7/00 1:00:56 PM, gschroed@senate.state.id.us writes:
<< Public School Appropriation recommended by Governor for FY 2001 is
$811,964,900, which is 46.68% of general fund dollars less Property Tax
Replacement Appropriation. FY 2000 Public School budget was $763,672,000
which was 47.22% of General fund dollars less Property Tax Replacement
Appropriation.
The tax cut would result in an amount for Public Schools which would be $15
or more less than the Governor's recommendation for FY 2001. Depending upon
which bill passes, there may be another $20 million taken out of the public
school budget for a loan fund for school facilities. >>
Thanks to Rep. Schroeder it appears what I suspected about Jim Fisher's
recent editorial in the Lewiston Morning Tribune is true. Fisher's slant on
the $41 million tax cut proposal was that it would reduce the school
appropriation $15 million below the Governor's school budget proposal.
>From Rep. Schroeder's figures, however, it appears the $15 million reduction
still results in an increase of $33 Million plus above last year's public
education funding.
With the possible additional reduction by $20 million directed to a school
facilities loan fund, the public school appropriation would still be up $13
million.
In my view, not quite Fisher's "It compromises public education."
Guess its all in the eye of the beholder.
Walter Steed
Back to TOC