vision2020
Re: highways to tomorrow
- To: "JS M" <jbiggs50@hotmail.com>, "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: highways to tomorrow
- From: Ken Medlin <dev-plan@moscow.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 00 05:27:12 -0800
- Resent-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:23:27 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <qrUm9D.A.aiI.8Lho4@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
> it will always be
>subsidized (just like wheat farming).
Is the BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit system) still subsidized, or do they
pay their way now? If the Oakland-SF Bay Bridge Aithority had not put in
the "fast auto commuter lanes" to promote multi-passenger cars, perhaps
BART would have done better. In Europe and NYC/Chicago/Boston (more
density, of course) rapid rail transit does pay for itself. Before GM
bought out the LA street car system (l946) and put in GM buses
(non-polluting, of course) that system was self-supporting. Then there's
always that question, Who decides? Who pays? According to the recent DN
piece about Lt. Gov. Butch Otter's plan for an I-95, it's already been
thru the planning stage and, now, who's going to put this monster on
us, that "the people", according to Otter's political philosophy, have
decided they want! Who went to the hearings? Comment?
------------------------
William K. Medlin
Dev-plan associates
930 Kenneth Street
Moscow ID 83843
208/892-0148
dev-plan@moscow.com
Back to TOC