vision2020
Re: net etiquette (another)
- To: "Robert Anton-Erik" <anton933@uidaho.edu>, vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Re: net etiquette (another)
- From: "Leo Ames" <leoames@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:28:47 -0700
- Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"cXxGJC.A.KDE.wZS83"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
I also received an irate, rather profane email shortly after I sent a short
posting to vision2020 Sunday, Sep 19. I was startled, reread my message
which seemed non-inflamatory, and deleted the iritating response. I didn't
realize at the time it might be part of a larger pattern. I don't know if
the e-mail address was the same gte.net one to which others have referred.
But their descriptions seem similar.
....... Leo Ames, Moscow
----------
>From: Robert Anton-Erik <anton933@uidaho.edu>
>To: vision2020@moscow.com
>Subject: net etiquette
>Date: Tue, Sep 28, 1999, 12:50 PM
>
>I also received an email from ian3@gte.net on August 11, 1999. I contacted
>gte.net with my complaint. They suggested forwarding a copy of the
>original email with full headers (your email program should have a setting
>somewhere to turn on full headers--check the help file) to abuse@gte.net.
>
>It sounds like this same address is being used to send harassing emails to
>people on the V2020 list. I would suggest that everyone who has received
>such an email to send it to the above address. If gte.net gets enough
>compliants they may actually do something about it.
>
>-------------------------------------
>Robert Anton-Erik
>anton933@uidaho.edu
>http://www.ets.uidaho.edu/rob/
>
>"The medium is not the message,
> the message is the message."
>-------------------------------------
>
Back to TOC