vision2020
Re: Guns, again
- To: sec@moscow.com, Vision2020@moscow.com
- Subject: Re: Guns, again
- From: "bill london" <bill_london@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 20:24:44 PDT
- Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 20:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"7BDx-C.A.1kB.HPu73"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
>From: sec@moscow.com
>To: Vision2020@moscow.com
>Subject: Re: Guns, again
>Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:45:43 -0700
>
> > Excuse me, Stan.
> >
> > When I have cited sources you have dismissed them.
>
>excuse me, maybe my memory is gone, but I don't recall you citing any.
>
> > You claim to have your information on good sources yet you do not give
> > them.
>
>untrue.. you are the one who refused to even consider them, I have
>cited several, Prof Lott's exellent book for one. pointed out several
May I request that you take this discussion off of the Vision 2020 list?
Keep talking among yourselves if you want, but I really feel the discussion
has lost interest for most members of the list, myself included.
Thanks BL
>web sites for another. you are the one who clearly stated that you
>refused to even consider my sources, yet you accuse me of not
>citing any, I do not have all these at my fingertips, but I am in the
>process of getting more. can you say the same?
>
> > Fair is Fair
> >
> > WB
>
>true,and your version of it seems a bit odd to me, I can hardly
>consider refusing all the data from one side fair..
>
>Stan
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Back to TOC