Re: 2nd Amendment

[sec@moscow.com]

> Constitutional protections are still in place, nothwithstanding all the
> violations you allude to. They have not been removed from our legal
> institutions, even if the latters' agents fail to enforce them. The ACLU
> can provide you with plenty of evidence on the constant pursuit of those
> who commit such violations. Also, from an ethnic point of view, the
> Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, AL, does the same thing. In
> fact, it has a suit pending agins the Idaho Aryan Supremacists that will
> probably come to court. The other alternatives would be: Ignore the
> violations as unfortunate, 2) take the law into your own hands and shoot
> the violators.  Take your choice.

hmm, in the Case of Randy weaver (and I am REALLY getting tired 
of defending a White Supremisist), he was found not guilty of all 
the weapons charges that the BATF had brought against him, were 
HIS right respected? what about his Dead wifes? were HER rights 
respected? what about the Sniper who killed her? has he been 
brought before a jury of 12 good men and true?, how can one say 
that rights are still in place when they are so blatenly violated? I 
believe it was Dr. King who said something about when one right is 
deniged, all rights are dengied? and we now are seeing wide 
spread reports and evidence about abuses by the FBI and BATF in 
regards to the Wacco. (which up untill recently, I did not believe the 
Feds started the fires, but now I am not sure)  

I find it is most interesting the prevelance of the attatude that one 
must constantly sue to make sure ones rights are not violated. if 
there is no effort to suppress them, then why must we constantly 
fight to retain them?


> 
> ------------------------
> William K. Medlin
> Dev-plan associates
> 930 Kenneth Street
> Moscow ID 83843
> 208/892-0148
> dev-plan@moscow.com
> 

Stan