Re: Guns, again

["T&E" <cumming@idaho.tds.net>]

>> Stan
>> 
>> I will await you references.  But I must say I would not consider the NRA
>> or the SAF very good sources.
>
>ah! I see. no refernce I site will be good enough for you will it? if 
>they disagree with you thier obvisouly biased and lieing.

Actually, I would be interested in seeing the souces of 
this information as well. It is true that some people or
organizations will manipulate or ignore facts for their own
personal benefit (as in the tobacco industries or the Neo- Nazis)
but if, say, the NRA supports "their" evidence with a scientific
study from an accredited college, then is it really biased?
If someone thinks so, perhaps they can seek out the next 
reference by looking for the results of said study.

>> Also, reference the Wiskey Rebellion, you mention that any decent post
>> revolutionary history book would have it. What is a decent book to you?  

>> Please give me YOUR reference.
>
>nice try.  but a not very subtle attempt. I will site a title, and you 
>will dismiss it, sorry, I played that game before, not playing it 
>again. I have better things to do with my time. (and trying to say 
>"see! he can't site a thing" isin't going to work., been there, done 
>that, got the T-shirt AND the water bottle)
>

History was never my strong point, and this "Whiskey Rebellion"
topic introduced recently is new to me. Is this about Prohibition,
or am I missing the point completely?
T. C.