vision2020
RE: Moscow surplus and seized weapons policy
- To: "Marc" <cram3813@uidaho.edu>, "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: RE: Moscow surplus and seized weapons policy
- From: Ken Medlin <dev-plan@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 99 12:49:54 -0800
- Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"ei0JhD.A.oXE.u9953"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
We can define the caliber very easily -- even a .22 is a lethal weapon,
but for hunting one has to go further. It's really not a very complicated
process if there's a will to do so. Where is there any justifiction for a
household to harbor a machine gun, a bomb, an AK, a grenade, etc, etc.
There's a line in there somewhere that can be drawn thru legislative and
law enforcement agencies. They represent us, don't they? If we don't like
how they behave, throw them out? Look at the national polls on what
should be done with murderous weapons of destruction? That's not
outlawing "legitimate weapons for self-defense or sporting activities."
There is, after all, some reason to be exercised. If not, the we can all
expect to be destroyed at some point when hate, envy, aggression,
insanity, etc. takes hold of a weapon of mass destruction against us.
There has got to be a line to prevent misuses of such armaments.
------------------------
William K. Medlin
Dev-plan associates
930 Kenneth Street
Moscow ID 83843
208/892-0148
dev-plan@moscow.com
Back to TOC