vision2020
Re: Unidentified subject!
- To: <sec@moscow.com>, "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
- From: Ken Medlin <dev-plan@moscow.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 99 12:38:08 -0800
- Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"kMy5a.A.GDD.iy953"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE
STATE, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed." (Art. 2) The provision must be taken in its entirety, not
only to justify the access by citizens to weapons of mass murder (AK's,
machine guns, artillery, etc.) which have no place in a citizen's home
when we have democratically appointed police, National Guards and Armed
Forces [l789 read Militia] under popular controls to secure person and
property. In 1789 we did NOT have the privilege of accessing murderous
weapons other than a flint rifle.In l789 - l812 the new nation was
threatend by both foreign and seditious elements. That was THEN, and the
purpose of the article. If one insists that such articles are cut in
stone never to be reinterpreted, then we are condemned to a governing
system that will ultimately be antiquated and useless, and lead to our
self-destruction.
"We the People ... in order to insure domestic TRANQUILITY, provide
for the COMMON DEFENSE, promote the GENERAL WELFARE, and secure the
blessings of LIBERTY... do establish this Constitution." (Preamble) These
provisions must be weighed in along with that which provides for citizen
ownership of a firearm for self defense. How can one maintain that a
"right" to possess lethal weapons capable of murdering scores of people
within a few seconds is consistent with securing domestic tranquility,
promoting people's welfare and protecting individual liberty to moving in
and about our communities without fear of lethal attack? Let's be
reasonaable, folks, and seek a solution to the madness through the
courts. If and when our separation of powers becomes so eroded that the
citizen is threatend with being stripped of all exercise of political
action, then resort to citizen militias with heavy weapons would be an
option. But when have we ever, ever been close to such a threat to our
constitutional rights? How dare we take little phrases our of our
Constitution and blatantly reinterpret their original provisions? God
help us.
------------------------
William K. Medlin
Dev-plan associates
930 Kenneth Street
Moscow ID 83843
208/892-0148
dev-plan@moscow.com
Back to TOC