vision2020
Fw: Molly Ivins' Wednesday column
- To: "Vision2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>
- Subject: Fw: Molly Ivins' Wednesday column
- From: "Sue Hovey" <suehovey@moscow.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 15:27:07 -0700
- Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: vision2020@moscow.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"KhE4l.A.F6D.-Uby3"@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: vision2020-request@moscow.com
My nephew sent me this Molly Ivins column and inasmuch as most of you
probably aren't taking the Fort Worth Star Telegram these days, I thought
you might appreciate this one--and if not, just quit reading at any point.
Sue Hovey
----- Original Message -----
From: Craig Young <cyoung@gte.net>
To: Sue Hovey <suehovey@moscow.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 1999 12:46 PM
Subject: Molly Ivins' Wednesday column
> > The real question: What did Bush learn?
> >
> > AUSTIN -- Watching the political press corps try to
figure out
> > what to do about George W. Bush's supposed cocaine
use is a
> > walking test case in media ethics that will be used
in
> > journalism schools for the next 50 years. You
probably didn't
> > know there were courses in media ethics. You may now
make
> > up your own joke.
> >
> > For starters, under the old rules, before we wrote
about
> > something we were expected to have some evidence that
it
> > was true. Under the new rules, the fact that there is
gossip
> > about someone is news, whether the gossip is true or
not. In
> > this case, the fact that Bush refuses to deny that he
used
> > cocaine has seemed to the entire press corps
sufficient
> > evidence -- a charming latter-day version of "Have
you
> > stopped beating your wife?"
> >
> > To add insult to injury, the Washington media --
whose
> > provincialism knows no bounds -- is busy analyzing
the Bush
> > campaign's response, deciding that it was
insufficiently nimble
> > for the big leagues, that he didn't stay "on-message"
(a mortal
> > sin), and otherwise picking apart his campaign
operation.
> >
> > The week before, they had of course been praising
said
> > operation as flawless and awesome. Now "Bush himself
is
> > responsible for the current flurry . . ." Oh, sure.
This is my
> > favorite media trick: We do something disgusting and
then
> > blame it on the person to whom it was done.
> >
> > The media, as happens so depressingly often, are
asking the
> > wrong question. Bush himself stands there and begs us
to ask
> > it. "I have learned from my mistakes," he says over
and over.
> > The question is: `What' did he learn?
> >
> > Until 1973, Texas had the most draconian drug laws in
the
> > nation. Whether they stopped Bush or not, they didn't
stop
> > me, didn't stop people now serving in the
Legislature, and
> > didn't stop most of a generation of Texans from
trying
> > marijuana. What did he learn from that? Nothing.
> >
> > Harsh laws do not stop young people from trying
illegal drugs.
> > So what does Bush do when he gets to be governor?
> > Increases the penalties and toughens the system so
it's harder
> > on young people. Signs a memorably stupid bill making
> > possession of less than a 20th of an ounce of cocaine
> > punishable by jail time.
> >
> > Are there people who are now in Texas prisons for
making
> > "youthful mistakes"? There are thousands of them.
Based on a
> > combination of Texas Department of Criminal Justice
figures
> > and U.S. Justice Department figures, there are at
least 5,000
> > people in Texas prisons for marijuana possession
alone. (The
> > numbers are extremely difficult to pin down, since
many of
> > those in for possession probably pleaded down from
other
> > charges; this is a conservative estimate.) Twenty
percent of
> > the Texas prison population of 147,000 is there on
> > drug-related charges.
> >
> > The truth is, if Bush `had' been caught using
marijuana or
> > cocaine 25 years ago, he would not have been
sentenced to
> > prison -- he was rich and white and his daddy was an
> > important guy. That's the way the system worked then;
that's
> > the way the system works now. Lee Otis Johnson, the
black
> > political activist from Houston, got 30 years for
marijuana;
> > white boys walked. Bush was there; he saw it happen;
what
> > did he learn?
> >
> > When he became governor, he had a world of
opportunity to
> > try to make the system more fair. What did he do? He
vetoed
> > Sen. Rodney Ellis' bill (passed unanimously by the
> > Republican-controlled Senate and by the House), which
would
> > have given poor defendants the right to see a lawyer
within 20
> > days. Twenty days, big deal -- in most of the
country, an
> > indigent defendant gets a lawyer within 72 hours or
they have
> > to let him go. We have poor people who spend months
in jail
> > just waiting to see a lawyer, who may be drunk or
> > incompetent or just sleep through his trial.
> >
> > Bush vetoed that bill. He learned nothing.
> >
> > When Bush came in as governor, this state had
committed to
> > the most extensive in-prison drug-and-alcohol
rehabilitation
> > program in the country -- the joint legacy of Ann
Richards and
> > Bob Bullock, both recovering alcoholics. Eighty
percent of the
> > people in Texas prisons are diagnosed by the system
as having
> > substance abuse problems. The entire program is gone
now,
> > completely repealed.
> >
> > Bush learned nothing. That's the story.
>
Back to TOC